Estonia vs Saint Barthelemy: People not using improved drinking water sources
Estonia
0 people
in 2024
Saint Barthelemy
0 people
in 2024
Estonia rank
182nd
Saint Barthelemy rank
182nd
People not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Estonia
- Saint Barthelemy
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0 people against 0 people in Saint Barthelemy, a difference of 0 people.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 182nd and Saint Barthelemy ranks 182nd of 231 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Saint Barthelemy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25,749 people | 37.95 people | 25,711 people | Estonia |
| 2010s | 5,908 people | 13.12 people | 5,895 people | Estonia |
| 2020s | 14.57 people | 0 people | 14.57 people | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using improved drinking water sources, Estonia or Saint Barthelemy?
- Estonia, at 0 people against 0 people in Saint Barthelemy as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using improved drinking water sources between Estonia and Saint Barthelemy?
- 0 people, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Saint Barthelemy?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Estonia and Saint Barthelemy rank globally for people not using improved drinking water sources?
- Estonia ranks 182nd and Saint Barthelemy ranks 182nd of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.