Eswatini vs Moldova: People not using improved drinking water sources
Eswatini
168,104 people
in 2024
Moldova
174,097 people
in 2024
Eswatini rank
88th
Moldova rank
87th
People not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Eswatini
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 174,097 people against 168,104 people in Eswatini, a difference of 5,993 people.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 88th and Moldova ranks 87th of 231 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 397,390 people | 559,540 people | 162,150 people | Moldova |
| 2010s | 284,338 people | 331,367 people | 47,029 people | Moldova |
| 2020s | 193,625 people | 201,621 people | 7,996 people | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using improved drinking water sources, Eswatini or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 174,097 people against 168,104 people in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using improved drinking water sources between Eswatini and Moldova?
- 5,993 people, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Moldova?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Moldova rank globally for people not using improved drinking water sources?
- Eswatini ranks 88th and Moldova ranks 87th of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.