Guam vs Reunion: People not using improved drinking water sources
Guam
789.72 people
in 2024
Reunion
1,017 people
in 2024
Guam rank
157th
Reunion rank
154th
People not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Guam
- Reunion
How they compare
Reunion currently reports 1,017 people against 789.72 people in Guam, a difference of 227.28 people.
That makes Reunion's figure about 1.3 times Guam's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Reunion has been ahead every year.
Guam ranks 157th and Reunion ranks 154th of 231 countries.
Reunion has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Reunion | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 842.99 people | 1,804 people | 960.64 people | Reunion |
| 2010s | 807.13 people | 1,457 people | 650.37 people | Reunion |
| 2020s | 779.46 people | 1,075 people | 295.43 people | Reunion |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using improved drinking water sources, Guam or Reunion?
- Reunion, at 1,017 people against 789.72 people in Guam as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using improved drinking water sources between Guam and Reunion?
- 227.28 people, with Reunion ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Reunion?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Guam and Reunion rank globally for people not using improved drinking water sources?
- Guam ranks 157th and Reunion ranks 154th of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.