Guam vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: People not using improved drinking water sources
Guam
789.72 people
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
653.12 people
in 2017
Guam rank
157th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
158th
People not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Guam
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Guam currently reports 789.72 people against 653.12 people in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 136.6 people.
That makes Guam's figure about 1.2 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Guam has been ahead every year.
Guam ranks 157th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 158th of 231 countries.
Guam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 842.99 people | 691.55 people | 151.44 people | Guam |
| 2010s | 814.39 people | 657.04 people | 157.35 people | Guam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using improved drinking water sources, Guam or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Guam, at 789.72 people against 653.12 people in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using improved drinking water sources between Guam and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 136.6 people, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Guam and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for people not using improved drinking water sources?
- Guam ranks 157th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 158th of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.