South Korea vs Tokelau: People not using improved drinking water sources
South Korea
0 people
in 2024
Tokelau
0 people
in 2024
South Korea rank
182nd
Tokelau rank
182nd
People not using improved drinking water sources over time
- South Korea
- Tokelau
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 0 people against 0 people in Tokelau, a difference of 0 people.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was South Korea ahead.
South Korea ranks 182nd and Tokelau ranks 182nd of 231 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 565,716 people | 33.28 people | 565,683 people | South Korea |
| 2010s | 314,841 people | 11.86 people | 314,829 people | South Korea |
| 2020s | 52,741 people | 0 people | 52,741 people | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using improved drinking water sources, South Korea or Tokelau?
- South Korea, at 0 people against 0 people in Tokelau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using improved drinking water sources between South Korea and Tokelau?
- 0 people, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Tokelau?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do South Korea and Tokelau rank globally for people not using improved drinking water sources?
- South Korea ranks 182nd and Tokelau ranks 182nd of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.