Latvia vs Mayotte: People not using improved drinking water sources
Latvia
10,110 people
in 2024
Mayotte
11,468 people
in 2023
Latvia rank
124th
Mayotte rank
121st
People not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Latvia
- Mayotte
How they compare
Mayotte currently reports 11,468 people against 10,110 people in Latvia, a difference of 1,358 people.
That makes Mayotte's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 124th and Mayotte ranks 121st of 231 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mayotte | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24,897 people | 5,138 people | 19,759 people | Latvia |
| 2010s | 17,749 people | 7,681 people | 10,069 people | Latvia |
| 2020s | 11,933 people | 10,887 people | 1,046 people | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using improved drinking water sources, Latvia or Mayotte?
- Mayotte, at 11,468 people against 10,110 people in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in people not using improved drinking water sources between Latvia and Mayotte?
- 1,358 people, with Mayotte ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mayotte?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Mayotte rank globally for people not using improved drinking water sources?
- Latvia ranks 124th and Mayotte ranks 121st of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.