Liechtenstein vs United Kingdom: People not using improved drinking water sources
Liechtenstein
0 people
in 2024
United Kingdom
0 people
in 2024
Liechtenstein rank
182nd
United Kingdom rank
182nd
People not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Liechtenstein
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Liechtenstein currently reports 0 people against 0 people in United Kingdom, a difference of 0 people.
Across all 25 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.
Liechtenstein ranks 182nd and United Kingdom ranks 182nd of 231 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liechtenstein | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 people | 0 people | 0 people | — |
| 2010s | 0 people | 0 people | 0 people | — |
| 2020s | 0 people | 0 people | 0 people | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using improved drinking water sources, Liechtenstein or United Kingdom?
- Liechtenstein, at 0 people against 0 people in United Kingdom as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using improved drinking water sources between Liechtenstein and United Kingdom?
- 0 people, with Liechtenstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liechtenstein and United Kingdom?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Liechtenstein and United Kingdom rank globally for people not using improved drinking water sources?
- Liechtenstein ranks 182nd and United Kingdom ranks 182nd of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.