Luxembourg vs Singapore: People not using improved drinking water sources
Luxembourg
0 people
in 2024
Singapore
0 people
in 2024
Luxembourg rank
182nd
Singapore rank
182nd
People not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Luxembourg
- Singapore
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0 people against 0 people in Singapore, a difference of 0 people.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Singapore ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 182nd and Singapore ranks 182nd of 231 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0034 people | 0 people | 0.0034 people | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0.0046 people | 0 people | 0.0046 people | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 0 people | 0 people | 0 people | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using improved drinking water sources, Luxembourg or Singapore?
- Luxembourg, at 0 people against 0 people in Singapore as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using improved drinking water sources between Luxembourg and Singapore?
- 0 people, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Singapore?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Singapore rank globally for people not using improved drinking water sources?
- Luxembourg ranks 182nd and Singapore ranks 182nd of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.