Macao vs Slovak Republic: People not using improved drinking water sources
Macao
0 people
in 2024
Slovak Republic
0 people
in 2024
Macao rank
182nd
Slovak Republic rank
182nd
People not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Macao
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Macao currently reports 0 people against 0 people in Slovak Republic, a difference of 0 people.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Slovak Republic has been ahead every year.
Macao ranks 182nd and Slovak Republic ranks 182nd of 231 countries.
Slovak Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macao | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 people | 0 people | 0 people | — |
| 2010s | 0 people | 0.0414 people | 0.0414 people | Slovak Republic |
| 2020s | 0 people | 0 people | 0 people | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using improved drinking water sources, Macao or Slovak Republic?
- Macao, at 0 people against 0 people in Slovak Republic as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using improved drinking water sources between Macao and Slovak Republic?
- 0 people, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Slovak Republic?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Macao and Slovak Republic rank globally for people not using improved drinking water sources?
- Macao ranks 182nd and Slovak Republic ranks 182nd of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.