Mali vs Rwanda: People not using improved drinking water sources
Mali
2.19 million people
in 2024
Rwanda
2.26 million people
in 2024
Mali rank
33rd
Rwanda rank
32nd
People not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Mali
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 2.26 million people against 2.19 million people in Mali, a difference of 68,790 people.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 33rd and Rwanda ranks 32nd of 231 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.11 million people | 2.68 million people | 2.44 million people | Mali |
| 2010s | 4.09 million people | 2.60 million people | 1.49 million people | Mali |
| 2020s | 2.68 million people | 2.36 million people | 319,632 people | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using improved drinking water sources, Mali or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 2.26 million people against 2.19 million people in Mali as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using improved drinking water sources between Mali and Rwanda?
- 68,790 people, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Rwanda?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Mali and Rwanda rank globally for people not using improved drinking water sources?
- Mali ranks 33rd and Rwanda ranks 32nd of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.