Puerto Rico vs Tokelau: People not using improved drinking water sources
Puerto Rico
0 people
in 2024
Tokelau
0 people
in 2024
Puerto Rico rank
182nd
Tokelau rank
182nd
People not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Puerto Rico
- Tokelau
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 0 people against 0 people in Tokelau, a difference of 0 people.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Puerto Rico ranks 182nd and Tokelau ranks 182nd of 231 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80,467 people | 36.69 people | 80,430 people | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 23,467 people | 11.86 people | 23,456 people | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 0 people | 0 people | 0 people | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using improved drinking water sources, Puerto Rico or Tokelau?
- Puerto Rico, at 0 people against 0 people in Tokelau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using improved drinking water sources between Puerto Rico and Tokelau?
- 0 people, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Tokelau?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Puerto Rico and Tokelau rank globally for people not using improved drinking water sources?
- Puerto Rico ranks 182nd and Tokelau ranks 182nd of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.