Belarus vs Fiji: People not using safely managed drinking water sources
Belarus
636,996 people
in 2024
Fiji
537,666 people
in 2024
Belarus rank
76th
Fiji rank
77th
People not using safely managed drinking water sources over time
- Belarus
- Fiji
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 636,996 people against 537,666 people in Fiji, a difference of 99,330 people.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Fiji's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 76th and Fiji ranks 77th of 163 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.52 million people | 528,902 people | 986,766 people | Belarus |
| 2010s | 760,705 people | 541,414 people | 219,291 people | Belarus |
| 2020s | 650,676 people | 535,327 people | 115,349 people | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed drinking water sources, Belarus or Fiji?
- Belarus, at 636,996 people against 537,666 people in Fiji as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed drinking water sources between Belarus and Fiji?
- 99,330 people, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Fiji?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Fiji rank globally for people not using safely managed drinking water sources?
- Belarus ranks 76th and Fiji ranks 77th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed drinking water sources either use unimproved drinking water sources or the improved sources they use are not located on their premises, not available when needed, or not free of contamination.