Chad vs Peru: People not using safely managed drinking water sources
Chad
19.01 million people
in 2024
Peru
17.30 million people
in 2024
Chad rank
24th
Peru rank
27th
People not using safely managed drinking water sources over time
- Chad
- Peru
How they compare
Chad currently reports 19.01 million people against 17.30 million people in Peru, a difference of 1.71 million people.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Peru ahead.
Chad ranks 24th and Peru ranks 27th of 163 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.56 million people | 14.86 million people | 5.30 million people | Peru |
| 2010s | 13.58 million people | 15.30 million people | 1.73 million people | Peru |
| 2020s | 17.46 million people | 16.53 million people | 933,440 people | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed drinking water sources, Chad or Peru?
- Chad, at 19.01 million people against 17.30 million people in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed drinking water sources between Chad and Peru?
- 1.71 million people, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Peru?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Chad and Peru rank globally for people not using safely managed drinking water sources?
- Chad ranks 24th and Peru ranks 27th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed drinking water sources either use unimproved drinking water sources or the improved sources they use are not located on their premises, not available when needed, or not free of contamination.