Cyprus vs Luxembourg: People not using safely managed drinking water sources
Cyprus
3,788 people
in 2024
Luxembourg
2,335 people
in 2024
Cyprus rank
139th
Luxembourg rank
142nd
People not using safely managed drinking water sources over time
- Cyprus
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 3,788 people against 2,335 people in Luxembourg, a difference of 1,453 people.
That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.6 times Luxembourg's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.
Cyprus ranks 139th and Luxembourg ranks 142nd of 163 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33,405 people | 801.62 people | 32,603 people | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 17,109 people | 1,596 people | 15,513 people | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 3,879 people | 2,312 people | 1,567 people | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed drinking water sources, Cyprus or Luxembourg?
- Cyprus, at 3,788 people against 2,335 people in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed drinking water sources between Cyprus and Luxembourg?
- 1,453 people, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Luxembourg?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Cyprus and Luxembourg rank globally for people not using safely managed drinking water sources?
- Cyprus ranks 139th and Luxembourg ranks 142nd of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed drinking water sources either use unimproved drinking water sources or the improved sources they use are not located on their premises, not available when needed, or not free of contamination.