Estonia vs Grenada: People not using safely managed drinking water sources
Estonia
14,369 people
in 2024
Grenada
11,639 people
in 2017
Estonia rank
125th
Grenada rank
127th
People not using safely managed drinking water sources over time
- Estonia
- Grenada
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 14,369 people against 11,639 people in Grenada, a difference of 2,730 people.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.2 times Grenada's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 125th and Grenada ranks 127th of 163 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92,503 people | 18,827 people | 73,676 people | Estonia |
| 2010s | 47,353 people | 12,007 people | 35,346 people | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed drinking water sources, Estonia or Grenada?
- Estonia, at 14,369 people against 11,639 people in Grenada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed drinking water sources between Estonia and Grenada?
- 2,730 people, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Grenada?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Estonia and Grenada rank globally for people not using safely managed drinking water sources?
- Estonia ranks 125th and Grenada ranks 127th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed drinking water sources either use unimproved drinking water sources or the improved sources they use are not located on their premises, not available when needed, or not free of contamination.