Eswatini vs Moldova: People not using safely managed drinking water sources
Eswatini
767,858 people
in 2024
Moldova
733,978 people
in 2024
Eswatini rank
74th
Moldova rank
75th
People not using safely managed drinking water sources over time
- Eswatini
- Moldova
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 767,858 people against 733,978 people in Moldova, a difference of 33,880 people.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Moldova ahead.
Eswatini ranks 74th and Moldova ranks 75th of 163 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Moldova in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 755,458 people | 2.02 million people | 1.26 million people | Moldova |
| 2010s | 746,426 people | 997,167 people | 250,742 people | Moldova |
| 2020s | 761,881 people | 758,998 people | 2,883 people | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed drinking water sources, Eswatini or Moldova?
- Eswatini, at 767,858 people against 733,978 people in Moldova as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed drinking water sources between Eswatini and Moldova?
- 33,880 people, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Moldova?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Moldova rank globally for people not using safely managed drinking water sources?
- Eswatini ranks 74th and Moldova ranks 75th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed drinking water sources either use unimproved drinking water sources or the improved sources they use are not located on their premises, not available when needed, or not free of contamination.