Fiji vs Moldova: People not using safely managed drinking water sources
Fiji
537,666 people
in 2024
Moldova
733,978 people
in 2024
Fiji rank
77th
Moldova rank
75th
People not using safely managed drinking water sources over time
- Fiji
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 733,978 people against 537,666 people in Fiji, a difference of 196,312 people.
That makes Moldova's figure about 1.4 times Fiji's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.
Fiji ranks 77th and Moldova ranks 75th of 163 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 528,902 people | 2.02 million people | 1.49 million people | Moldova |
| 2010s | 541,414 people | 997,167 people | 455,753 people | Moldova |
| 2020s | 535,327 people | 758,998 people | 223,671 people | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed drinking water sources, Fiji or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 733,978 people against 537,666 people in Fiji as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed drinking water sources between Fiji and Moldova?
- 196,312 people, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Moldova?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Fiji and Moldova rank globally for people not using safely managed drinking water sources?
- Fiji ranks 77th and Moldova ranks 75th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed drinking water sources either use unimproved drinking water sources or the improved sources they use are not located on their premises, not available when needed, or not free of contamination.