Guam vs Slovenia: People not using safely managed drinking water sources
Guam
10,071 people
in 2024
Slovenia
9,013 people
in 2024
Guam rank
128th
Slovenia rank
131st
People not using safely managed drinking water sources over time
- Guam
- Slovenia
How they compare
Guam currently reports 10,071 people against 9,013 people in Slovenia, a difference of 1,058 people.
That makes Guam's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Slovenia ahead.
Guam ranks 128th and Slovenia ranks 131st of 163 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,169 people | 163,940 people | 162,771 people | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 2,111 people | 104,477 people | 102,366 people | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 6,385 people | 21,157 people | 14,772 people | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed drinking water sources, Guam or Slovenia?
- Guam, at 10,071 people against 9,013 people in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed drinking water sources between Guam and Slovenia?
- 1,058 people, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Slovenia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Guam and Slovenia rank globally for people not using safely managed drinking water sources?
- Guam ranks 128th and Slovenia ranks 131st of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed drinking water sources either use unimproved drinking water sources or the improved sources they use are not located on their premises, not available when needed, or not free of contamination.