Hong Kong vs New Zealand: People not using safely managed drinking water sources
Hong Kong
0 people
in 2024
New Zealand
0 people
in 2024
Hong Kong rank
152nd
New Zealand rank
152nd
People not using safely managed drinking water sources over time
- Hong Kong
- New Zealand
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0 people against 0 people in New Zealand, a difference of 0 people.
Across all 25 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 152nd and New Zealand ranks 152nd of 163 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85,617 people | 596,702 people | 511,084 people | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 27,817 people | 284,250 people | 256,433 people | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0 people | 9,082 people | 9,082 people | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed drinking water sources, Hong Kong or New Zealand?
- Hong Kong, at 0 people against 0 people in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed drinking water sources between Hong Kong and New Zealand?
- 0 people, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and New Zealand?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Hong Kong and New Zealand rank globally for people not using safely managed drinking water sources?
- Hong Kong ranks 152nd and New Zealand ranks 152nd of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed drinking water sources either use unimproved drinking water sources or the improved sources they use are not located on their premises, not available when needed, or not free of contamination.