Hungary vs San Marino: People not using safely managed drinking water sources
Hungary
0 people
in 2024
San Marino
0.0026 people
in 2024
Hungary rank
152nd
San Marino rank
151st
People not using safely managed drinking water sources over time
- Hungary
- San Marino
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 0.0026 people against 0 people in Hungary, a difference of 0.0026 people.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 152nd and San Marino ranks 151st of 163 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.60 million people | 0 people | 1.60 million people | Hungary |
| 2010s | 981,140 people | 0.0003 people | 981,140 people | Hungary |
| 2020s | 89,626 people | 0.0005 people | 89,626 people | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed drinking water sources, Hungary or San Marino?
- San Marino, at 0.0026 people against 0 people in Hungary as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed drinking water sources between Hungary and San Marino?
- 0.0026 people, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and San Marino?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Hungary and San Marino rank globally for people not using safely managed drinking water sources?
- Hungary ranks 152nd and San Marino ranks 151st of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed drinking water sources either use unimproved drinking water sources or the improved sources they use are not located on their premises, not available when needed, or not free of contamination.