Iceland vs Singapore: People not using safely managed drinking water sources
Iceland
0 people
in 2024
Singapore
0 people
in 2024
Iceland rank
152nd
Singapore rank
152nd
People not using safely managed drinking water sources over time
- Iceland
- Singapore
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 people against 0 people in Singapore, a difference of 0 people.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 152nd and Singapore ranks 152nd of 163 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21,995 people | 0 people | 21,995 people | Iceland |
| 2010s | 6,857 people | 0 people | 6,857 people | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0 people | 0 people | 0 people | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed drinking water sources, Iceland or Singapore?
- Iceland, at 0 people against 0 people in Singapore as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed drinking water sources between Iceland and Singapore?
- 0 people, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Singapore?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Singapore rank globally for people not using safely managed drinking water sources?
- Iceland ranks 152nd and Singapore ranks 152nd of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed drinking water sources either use unimproved drinking water sources or the improved sources they use are not located on their premises, not available when needed, or not free of contamination.