Japan vs Lesotho: People not using safely managed drinking water sources
Japan
1.58 million people
in 2024
Lesotho
1.61 million people
in 2024
Japan rank
65th
Lesotho rank
64th
People not using safely managed drinking water sources over time
- Japan
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 1.61 million people against 1.58 million people in Japan, a difference of 30,000 people.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 65th and Lesotho ranks 64th of 163 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.64 million people | 1.72 million people | 916,254 people | Japan |
| 2010s | 2.11 million people | 1.62 million people | 491,708 people | Japan |
| 2020s | 1.66 million people | 1.61 million people | 46,398 people | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed drinking water sources, Japan or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 1.61 million people against 1.58 million people in Japan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed drinking water sources between Japan and Lesotho?
- 30,000 people, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Lesotho?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Lesotho rank globally for people not using safely managed drinking water sources?
- Japan ranks 65th and Lesotho ranks 64th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed drinking water sources either use unimproved drinking water sources or the improved sources they use are not located on their premises, not available when needed, or not free of contamination.