Jersey vs Tuvalu: People not using safely managed drinking water sources
Jersey
7,430 people
in 2024
Tuvalu
8,805 people
in 2024
Jersey rank
135th
Tuvalu rank
132nd
People not using safely managed drinking water sources over time
- Jersey
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 8,805 people against 7,430 people in Jersey, a difference of 1,375 people.
That makes Tuvalu's figure about 1.2 times Jersey's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.
Jersey ranks 135th and Tuvalu ranks 132nd of 163 countries.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jersey | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,097 people | 9,493 people | 1,396 people | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | 8,052 people | 9,936 people | 1,884 people | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 7,433 people | 9,143 people | 1,711 people | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed drinking water sources, Jersey or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 8,805 people against 7,430 people in Jersey as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed drinking water sources between Jersey and Tuvalu?
- 1,375 people, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jersey and Tuvalu?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Jersey and Tuvalu rank globally for people not using safely managed drinking water sources?
- Jersey ranks 135th and Tuvalu ranks 132nd of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed drinking water sources either use unimproved drinking water sources or the improved sources they use are not located on their premises, not available when needed, or not free of contamination.