Liechtenstein vs Macao: People not using safely managed drinking water sources
Liechtenstein
0 people
in 2024
Macao
0 people
in 2024
Liechtenstein rank
152nd
Macao rank
152nd
People not using safely managed drinking water sources over time
- Liechtenstein
- Macao
How they compare
Liechtenstein currently reports 0 people against 0 people in Macao, a difference of 0 people.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.
Liechtenstein ranks 152nd and Macao ranks 152nd of 163 countries.
Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liechtenstein | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 people | 104.99 people | 104.99 people | Macao |
| 2010s | 0 people | 38.56 people | 38.56 people | Macao |
| 2020s | 0 people | 0 people | 0 people | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed drinking water sources, Liechtenstein or Macao?
- Liechtenstein, at 0 people against 0 people in Macao as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed drinking water sources between Liechtenstein and Macao?
- 0 people, with Liechtenstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liechtenstein and Macao?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Liechtenstein and Macao rank globally for people not using safely managed drinking water sources?
- Liechtenstein ranks 152nd and Macao ranks 152nd of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed drinking water sources either use unimproved drinking water sources or the improved sources they use are not located on their premises, not available when needed, or not free of contamination.