Lithuania vs Montenegro: People not using safely managed drinking water sources
Lithuania
93,391 people
in 2024
Montenegro
92,574 people
in 2024
Lithuania rank
105th
Montenegro rank
106th
People not using safely managed drinking water sources over time
- Lithuania
- Montenegro
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 93,391 people against 92,574 people in Montenegro, a difference of 817 people.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 105th and Montenegro ranks 106th of 163 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 699,936 people | 100,867 people | 599,069 people | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 301,288 people | 94,603 people | 206,685 people | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 103,727 people | 90,091 people | 13,637 people | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed drinking water sources, Lithuania or Montenegro?
- Lithuania, at 93,391 people against 92,574 people in Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed drinking water sources between Lithuania and Montenegro?
- 817 people, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Montenegro?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Montenegro rank globally for people not using safely managed drinking water sources?
- Lithuania ranks 105th and Montenegro ranks 106th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed drinking water sources either use unimproved drinking water sources or the improved sources they use are not located on their premises, not available when needed, or not free of contamination.