Lithuania vs Samoa: People not using safely managed drinking water sources
Lithuania
93,391 people
in 2024
Samoa
81,753 people
in 2024
Lithuania rank
105th
Samoa rank
107th
People not using safely managed drinking water sources over time
- Lithuania
- Samoa
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 93,391 people against 81,753 people in Samoa, a difference of 11,638 people.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Samoa's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 105th and Samoa ranks 107th of 163 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 869,055 people | 74,243 people | 794,813 people | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 301,288 people | 77,940 people | 223,348 people | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 103,727 people | 80,984 people | 22,743 people | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed drinking water sources, Lithuania or Samoa?
- Lithuania, at 93,391 people against 81,753 people in Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed drinking water sources between Lithuania and Samoa?
- 11,638 people, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Samoa?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Samoa rank globally for people not using safely managed drinking water sources?
- Lithuania ranks 105th and Samoa ranks 107th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed drinking water sources either use unimproved drinking water sources or the improved sources they use are not located on their premises, not available when needed, or not free of contamination.