Macao vs Saint Helena: People not using safely managed drinking water sources
Macao
0 people
in 2024
Saint Helena
84.09 people
in 2024
Macao rank
152nd
Saint Helena rank
149th
People not using safely managed drinking water sources over time
- Macao
- Saint Helena
How they compare
Saint Helena currently reports 84.09 people against 0 people in Macao, a difference of 84.09 people.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Saint Helena has been ahead every year.
Macao ranks 152nd and Saint Helena ranks 149th of 163 countries.
Saint Helena has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macao | Saint Helena | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 103.57 people | 1,055 people | 951.81 people | Saint Helena |
| 2010s | 38.56 people | 658.7 people | 620.14 people | Saint Helena |
| 2020s | 0 people | 84.32 people | 84.32 people | Saint Helena |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed drinking water sources, Macao or Saint Helena?
- Saint Helena, at 84.09 people against 0 people in Macao as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed drinking water sources between Macao and Saint Helena?
- 84.09 people, with Saint Helena ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Saint Helena?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Macao and Saint Helena rank globally for people not using safely managed drinking water sources?
- Macao ranks 152nd and Saint Helena ranks 149th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed drinking water sources either use unimproved drinking water sources or the improved sources they use are not located on their premises, not available when needed, or not free of contamination.