Mayotte vs Slovakia: People not using safely managed drinking water sources
Mayotte
23,824 people
in 2023
Slovakia
23,593 people
in 2024
Mayotte rank
121st
Slovakia rank
122nd
People not using safely managed drinking water sources over time
- Mayotte
- Slovakia
How they compare
Mayotte currently reports 23,824 people against 23,593 people in Slovakia, a difference of 231 people.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Slovakia has been ahead every year.
Mayotte ranks 121st and Slovakia ranks 122nd of 163 regions.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mayotte | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40,050 people | 197,606 people | 157,555 people | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 26,829 people | 58,727 people | 31,898 people | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 21,916 people | 31,338 people | 9,423 people | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed drinking water sources, Mayotte or Slovakia?
- Mayotte, at 23,824 people against 23,593 people in Slovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed drinking water sources between Mayotte and Slovakia?
- 231 people, with Mayotte ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mayotte and Slovakia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Mayotte and Slovakia rank globally for people not using safely managed drinking water sources?
- Mayotte ranks 121st and Slovakia ranks 122nd of 163 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed drinking water sources either use unimproved drinking water sources or the improved sources they use are not located on their premises, not available when needed, or not free of contamination.