Mayotte vs Sweden: People not using safely managed drinking water sources
Mayotte
23,824 people
in 2023
Sweden
25,372 people
in 2024
Mayotte rank
121st
Sweden rank
118th
People not using safely managed drinking water sources over time
- Mayotte
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 25,372 people against 23,824 people in Mayotte, a difference of 1,548 people.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Mayotte's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Mayotte ranks 121st and Sweden ranks 118th of 163 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mayotte | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40,050 people | 46,534 people | 6,484 people | Sweden |
| 2010s | 26,829 people | 37,139 people | 10,310 people | Sweden |
| 2020s | 21,916 people | 26,878 people | 4,963 people | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed drinking water sources, Mayotte or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 25,372 people against 23,824 people in Mayotte as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed drinking water sources between Mayotte and Sweden?
- 1,548 people, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mayotte and Sweden?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Mayotte and Sweden rank globally for people not using safely managed drinking water sources?
- Mayotte ranks 121st and Sweden ranks 118th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed drinking water sources either use unimproved drinking water sources or the improved sources they use are not located on their premises, not available when needed, or not free of contamination.