Monaco vs New Zealand: People not using safely managed drinking water sources
Monaco
0 people
in 2024
New Zealand
0 people
in 2024
Monaco rank
152nd
New Zealand rank
152nd
People not using safely managed drinking water sources over time
- Monaco
- New Zealand
How they compare
Monaco currently reports 0 people against 0 people in New Zealand, a difference of 0 people.
Across all 25 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Monaco ranks 152nd and New Zealand ranks 152nd of 163 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Monaco | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 people | 596,702 people | 596,702 people | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0 people | 284,250 people | 284,250 people | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0 people | 9,082 people | 9,082 people | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed drinking water sources, Monaco or New Zealand?
- Monaco, at 0 people against 0 people in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed drinking water sources between Monaco and New Zealand?
- 0 people, with Monaco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and New Zealand?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Monaco and New Zealand rank globally for people not using safely managed drinking water sources?
- Monaco ranks 152nd and New Zealand ranks 152nd of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed drinking water sources either use unimproved drinking water sources or the improved sources they use are not located on their premises, not available when needed, or not free of contamination.