Nauru vs Slovenia: People not using safely managed drinking water sources
Nauru
9,717 people
in 2024
Slovenia
9,013 people
in 2024
Nauru rank
129th
Slovenia rank
131st
People not using safely managed drinking water sources over time
- Nauru
- Slovenia
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 9,717 people against 9,013 people in Slovenia, a difference of 704 people.
That makes Nauru's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Slovenia ahead.
Nauru ranks 129th and Slovenia ranks 131st of 163 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,186 people | 163,940 people | 155,754 people | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 8,798 people | 104,477 people | 95,679 people | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 9,594 people | 21,157 people | 11,563 people | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed drinking water sources, Nauru or Slovenia?
- Nauru, at 9,717 people against 9,013 people in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed drinking water sources between Nauru and Slovenia?
- 704 people, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Slovenia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Nauru and Slovenia rank globally for people not using safely managed drinking water sources?
- Nauru ranks 129th and Slovenia ranks 131st of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed drinking water sources either use unimproved drinking water sources or the improved sources they use are not located on their premises, not available when needed, or not free of contamination.