Slovenia vs Tuvalu: People not using safely managed drinking water sources
Slovenia
9,013 people
in 2024
Tuvalu
8,805 people
in 2024
Slovenia rank
131st
Tuvalu rank
132nd
People not using safely managed drinking water sources over time
- Slovenia
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 9,013 people against 8,805 people in Tuvalu, a difference of 208 people.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Slovenia ranks 131st and Tuvalu ranks 132nd of 163 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 163,940 people | 9,142 people | 154,798 people | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 104,477 people | 9,936 people | 94,541 people | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 21,157 people | 9,143 people | 12,014 people | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed drinking water sources, Slovenia or Tuvalu?
- Slovenia, at 9,013 people against 8,805 people in Tuvalu as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed drinking water sources between Slovenia and Tuvalu?
- 208 people, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Tuvalu?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Slovenia and Tuvalu rank globally for people not using safely managed drinking water sources?
- Slovenia ranks 131st and Tuvalu ranks 132nd of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed drinking water sources either use unimproved drinking water sources or the improved sources they use are not located on their premises, not available when needed, or not free of contamination.