Argentina vs Serbia: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Argentina
- Serbia
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 30.61 kg/ha against 30.57 kg/ha in Serbia, a difference of 0.04 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Argentina ranks 110th and Serbia ranks 111th of 201 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.41 kg/ha | 56.85 kg/ha | 32.43 kg/ha | Serbia |
| 2010s | 20.14 kg/ha | 43.52 kg/ha | 23.38 kg/ha | Serbia |
| 2020s | 24.65 kg/ha | 38.37 kg/ha | 13.72 kg/ha | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Argentina or Serbia?
- Argentina, at 30.61 kg/ha against 30.57 kg/ha in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Argentina and Serbia?
- 0.04 kg/ha, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Serbia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Argentina ranks 110th and Serbia ranks 111th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).