Azerbaijan vs Hungary: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Azerbaijan
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 8.62 kg/ha against 4.94 kg/ha in Azerbaijan, a difference of 3.68 kg/ha.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.7 times Azerbaijan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 154th and Hungary ranks 151st of 186 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.04 kg/ha | 38.14 kg/ha | 32.1 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 2000s | -4.74 kg/ha | 39.1 kg/ha | 43.84 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 2010s | 4.23 kg/ha | 40.01 kg/ha | 35.78 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 2020s | 3.81 kg/ha | 47.47 kg/ha | 43.66 kg/ha | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Azerbaijan or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 8.62 kg/ha against 4.94 kg/ha in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Azerbaijan and Hungary?
- 3.68 kg/ha, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Hungary?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Hungary rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Azerbaijan ranks 154th and Hungary ranks 151st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).