Belarus vs Middle Africa: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Belarus
- Middle Africa
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 100.89 kg/ha against 5.48 kg/ha in Middle Africa, a difference of 95.41 kg/ha.
That makes Belarus's figure about 18.4 times Middle Africa's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 34th and Middle Africa ranks 31st of 201 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Middle Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 66.79 kg/ha | 6.03 kg/ha | 60.76 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2000s | 82.4 kg/ha | 5.99 kg/ha | 76.41 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2010s | 95.65 kg/ha | 5.27 kg/ha | 90.37 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2020s | 93.97 kg/ha | 5.47 kg/ha | 88.5 kg/ha | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Belarus or Middle Africa?
- Belarus, at 100.89 kg/ha against 5.48 kg/ha in Middle Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Belarus and Middle Africa?
- 95.41 kg/ha, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Middle Africa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Middle Africa rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Belarus ranks 34th and Middle Africa ranks 31st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).