Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area

Democratic Republic of the Congo
0.4255 kg/ha
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
10.19 kg/ha
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
14th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
11th

Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0510196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 10.19 kg/ha against 0.4255 kg/ha in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 9.76 kg/ha.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 24.0 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 14th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 11th of 18 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s -0.3804 kg/ha 0.3077 kg/ha 0.6881 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 0.8163 kg/ha 0.9044 kg/ha 0.0881 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 0.2479 kg/ha 1.6 kg/ha 1.35 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 0.5642 kg/ha 3.04 kg/ha 2.47 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 0.6028 kg/ha 4.7 kg/ha 4.1 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
2010s -0.9094 kg/ha 6.7 kg/ha 7.61 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
2020s -0.2785 kg/ha 8.34 kg/ha 8.62 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Democratic Republic of the Congo or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 10.19 kg/ha against 0.4255 kg/ha in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Republic of Tanzania?
9.76 kg/ha, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 14th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 11th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).