Equatorial Guinea vs USSR: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- USSR
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports -4.07 kg/ha against -4.6 kg/ha in USSR, a difference of 0.53 kg/ha.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 168th and USSR ranks 169th of 186 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | USSR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -0.6469 kg/ha | -8.14 kg/ha | 7.49 kg/ha | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1970s | 1.59 kg/ha | -8.26 kg/ha | 9.85 kg/ha | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1980s | -0.8883 kg/ha | -4.34 kg/ha | 3.45 kg/ha | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1990s | -2.07 kg/ha | -6.94 kg/ha | 4.86 kg/ha | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Equatorial Guinea or USSR?
- Equatorial Guinea, at -4.07 kg/ha against -4.6 kg/ha in USSR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Equatorial Guinea and USSR?
- 0.53 kg/ha, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and USSR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and USSR rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 168th and USSR ranks 169th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).