Guatemala vs Kyrgyzstan: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Guatemala
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 39.07 kg/ha against 37.95 kg/ha in Guatemala, a difference of 1.12 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 93rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 91st of 186 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 41.39 kg/ha | 20.46 kg/ha | 20.93 kg/ha | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 35.57 kg/ha | 7.69 kg/ha | 27.88 kg/ha | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 41.98 kg/ha | 29.33 kg/ha | 12.65 kg/ha | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 44.52 kg/ha | 39.91 kg/ha | 4.61 kg/ha | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Guatemala or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 39.07 kg/ha against 37.95 kg/ha in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Guatemala and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.12 kg/ha, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Kyrgyzstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Guatemala ranks 93rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 91st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).