Lithuania vs Nepal: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Lithuania
- Nepal
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 34.94 kg/ha against 33.87 kg/ha in Nepal, a difference of 1.07 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 105th and Nepal ranks 107th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 37.9 kg/ha | 59.23 kg/ha | 21.33 kg/ha | Nepal |
| 2000s | 61.74 kg/ha | 31.4 kg/ha | 30.33 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 51.03 kg/ha | 53.21 kg/ha | 2.18 kg/ha | Nepal |
| 2020s | 37.98 kg/ha | 51.69 kg/ha | 13.71 kg/ha | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Lithuania or Nepal?
- Lithuania, at 34.94 kg/ha against 33.87 kg/ha in Nepal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Lithuania and Nepal?
- 1.07 kg/ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Nepal?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Nepal rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Lithuania ranks 105th and Nepal ranks 107th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).