Malawi vs Slovenia: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Malawi
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 79.73 kg/ha against 75 kg/ha in Malawi, a difference of 4.73 kg/ha.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 49th and Slovenia ranks 46th of 201 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12.98 kg/ha | 135.11 kg/ha | 122.12 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 21.06 kg/ha | 142.63 kg/ha | 121.56 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 33.51 kg/ha | 78.36 kg/ha | 44.86 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 54.34 kg/ha | 79.56 kg/ha | 25.23 kg/ha | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Malawi or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 79.73 kg/ha against 75 kg/ha in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Malawi and Slovenia?
- 4.73 kg/ha, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Slovenia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Malawi ranks 49th and Slovenia ranks 46th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).