Mauritius vs Yugoslav SFR: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Mauritius
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports -26.89 kg/ha against -31.06 kg/ha in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 4.17 kg/ha.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 180th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 181st of 186 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -78.51 kg/ha | -14.77 kg/ha | 63.74 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | -83.05 kg/ha | -16.38 kg/ha | 66.67 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | -67.45 kg/ha | -17.47 kg/ha | 49.99 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | -66.71 kg/ha | -23.85 kg/ha | 42.86 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Mauritius or Yugoslav SFR?
- Mauritius, at -26.89 kg/ha against -31.06 kg/ha in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Mauritius and Yugoslav SFR?
- 4.17 kg/ha, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Mauritius and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Mauritius ranks 180th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 181st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).