Nauru vs Yugoslav SFR: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Nauru
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports -31.06 kg/ha against -42.25 kg/ha in Nauru, a difference of 11.19 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Yugoslav SFR ahead.
Nauru ranks 183rd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 180th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 1 and Yugoslav SFR in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -40.62 kg/ha | -14.77 kg/ha | 25.85 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | -35.92 kg/ha | -16.38 kg/ha | 19.54 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | -31.17 kg/ha | -17.47 kg/ha | 13.7 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | -23.71 kg/ha | -23.85 kg/ha | 0.1441 kg/ha | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Nauru or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at -31.06 kg/ha against -42.25 kg/ha in Nauru as of 1991.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Nauru and Yugoslav SFR?
- 11.19 kg/ha, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Nauru and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Nauru ranks 183rd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 180th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).