Sao Tome and Principe vs Sudan: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Sudan
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 13.25 kg/ha against 12.67 kg/ha in Sudan, a difference of 0.58 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 134th and Sudan ranks 137th of 186 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.3 kg/ha | 12 kg/ha | 7.7 kg/ha | Sudan |
| 2020s | 12.92 kg/ha | 14.11 kg/ha | 1.19 kg/ha | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Sao Tome and Principe or Sudan?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 13.25 kg/ha against 12.67 kg/ha in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Sao Tome and Principe and Sudan?
- 0.58 kg/ha, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Sudan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 134th and Sudan ranks 137th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).