Afghanistan vs Rwanda: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Afghanistan
- Rwanda
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 77.08 % against 75.58 % in Rwanda, a difference of 1.5 %.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 46th and Rwanda ranks 48th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 71.77 % | 99.63 % | 27.86 % | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 63.76 % | 100.02 % | 36.26 % | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 49.41 % | 103.25 % | 53.85 % | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 64.73 % | 96.15 % | 31.42 % | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 82.26 % | 93.69 % | 11.43 % | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 71.73 % | 80.01 % | 8.28 % | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 77.68 % | 73.09 % | 4.59 % | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Afghanistan or Rwanda?
- Afghanistan, at 77.08 % against 75.58 % in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Afghanistan and Rwanda?
- 1.5 %, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Rwanda rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Afghanistan ranks 46th and Rwanda ranks 48th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).