Argentina vs Cambodia: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Argentina
- Cambodia
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 67.77 % against 65.16 % in Cambodia, a difference of 2.61 %.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 52nd and Cambodia ranks 55th of 186 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Cambodia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 130.06 % | 38.27 % | 91.79 % | Argentina |
| 1970s | 121.21 % | 32.47 % | 88.73 % | Argentina |
| 1980s | 106.16 % | 34.18 % | 71.97 % | Argentina |
| 1990s | 89.92 % | 33.57 % | 56.35 % | Argentina |
| 2000s | 80.05 % | 49.71 % | 30.34 % | Argentina |
| 2010s | 83.01 % | 67.87 % | 15.14 % | Argentina |
| 2020s | 77.79 % | 65.4 % | 12.39 % | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Argentina or Cambodia?
- Argentina, at 67.77 % against 65.16 % in Cambodia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Argentina and Cambodia?
- 2.61 %, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Cambodia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Cambodia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Argentina ranks 52nd and Cambodia ranks 55th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).