Australia vs Cuba: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Australia
- Cuba
How they compare
Australia currently reports 80.33 % against 79.14 % in Cuba, a difference of 1.19 %.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Australia ranks 38th and Cuba ranks 40th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Cuba in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 147.78 % | 98.82 % | 48.96 % | Australia |
| 1970s | 122.02 % | 90.18 % | 31.83 % | Australia |
| 1980s | 111.67 % | 70.57 % | 41.1 % | Australia |
| 1990s | 82 % | 82.71 % | 0.7141 % | Cuba |
| 2000s | 79.41 % | 94.23 % | 14.82 % | Cuba |
| 2010s | 74.81 % | 78.53 % | 3.72 % | Cuba |
| 2020s | 68.27 % | 80.53 % | 12.26 % | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Australia or Cuba?
- Australia, at 80.33 % against 79.14 % in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Australia and Cuba?
- 1.19 %, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Cuba?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Cuba rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Australia ranks 38th and Cuba ranks 40th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).