Bahamas vs Czechoslovakia: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Bahamas
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 41.99 % against 41.6 % in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 0.39 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Czechoslovakia ahead.
Bahamas ranks 129th and Czechoslovakia ranks 131st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 3 and Czechoslovakia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 20.11 % | 30.27 % | 10.16 % | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 27.19 % | 26.29 % | 0.8995 % | Bahamas |
| 1980s | 35.35 % | 26.35 % | 9.01 % | Bahamas |
| 1990s | 39.37 % | 39.36 % | 0.0072 % | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Bahamas or Czechoslovakia?
- Bahamas, at 41.99 % against 41.6 % in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Bahamas and Czechoslovakia?
- 0.39 %, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Bahamas and Czechoslovakia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Bahamas ranks 129th and Czechoslovakia ranks 131st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).