Bangladesh vs Italy: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Bangladesh
- Italy
How they compare
Italy currently reports 41.96 % against 40.27 % in Bangladesh, a difference of 1.69 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 133rd and Italy ranks 130th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 3 and Italy in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 46.64 % | 40.89 % | 5.75 % | Bangladesh |
| 1970s | 41.13 % | 33.2 % | 7.92 % | Bangladesh |
| 1980s | 38.38 % | 31.9 % | 6.48 % | Bangladesh |
| 1990s | 30.42 % | 37.48 % | 7.06 % | Italy |
| 2000s | 33.65 % | 40.63 % | 6.98 % | Italy |
| 2010s | 39.57 % | 42.84 % | 3.27 % | Italy |
| 2020s | 39.55 % | 42.73 % | 3.17 % | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Bangladesh or Italy?
- Italy, at 41.96 % against 40.27 % in Bangladesh as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Bangladesh and Italy?
- 1.69 %, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Italy?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Italy rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Bangladesh ranks 133rd and Italy ranks 130th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).