Bangladesh vs Malawi: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Bangladesh
- Malawi
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 40.27 % against 39.32 % in Malawi, a difference of 0.95 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malawi ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 133rd and Malawi ranks 135th of 201 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 46.64 % | 61.05 % | 14.42 % | Malawi |
| 1970s | 41.13 % | 59.87 % | 18.74 % | Malawi |
| 1980s | 38.38 % | 59.19 % | 20.81 % | Malawi |
| 1990s | 30.42 % | 63.02 % | 32.6 % | Malawi |
| 2000s | 33.65 % | 57.72 % | 24.07 % | Malawi |
| 2010s | 39.57 % | 55.14 % | 15.57 % | Malawi |
| 2020s | 39.55 % | 47.66 % | 8.11 % | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Bangladesh or Malawi?
- Bangladesh, at 40.27 % against 39.32 % in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Bangladesh and Malawi?
- 0.95 %, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Malawi?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Malawi rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Bangladesh ranks 133rd and Malawi ranks 135th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).