Belgium-Luxembourg vs Suriname: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Suriname
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 22.67 % against 22.62 % in Suriname, a difference of 0.05 %.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 162nd and Suriname ranks 163rd of 185 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium-Luxembourg | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 19.86 % | 66.46 % | 46.6 % | Suriname |
| 1970s | 17.72 % | 51.73 % | 34.01 % | Suriname |
| 1980s | 18.79 % | 50.3 % | 31.51 % | Suriname |
| 1990s | 21.3 % | 49.28 % | 27.98 % | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Belgium-Luxembourg or Suriname?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 22.67 % against 22.62 % in Suriname as of 1999.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Belgium-Luxembourg and Suriname?
- 0.05 %, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Suriname?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Suriname rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 162nd and Suriname ranks 163rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).